Re: [Ausloco] RE: T413

[James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>]

I never said they entered service with these numbers. All I said was "H1 - 5 were
originally delivered as T413 - T417". I think the thread gradually changed to what
numbers they entered service with.

David Langley wrote:

> I think my message to Leon was quite clear. What they had when they passed
> Goulburn North Box is irrelevant. It's what numbers they had in traffic that was
> under discussion all those messages ago. I still am quite sure that only 1 maybe
> 2 had T class numbers after they were issued to traffic. The remainder appear to
> have been renumbered prior to entering traffic.
>
> Roger Renton wrote:
>
> >     David Langley wrote:
> >
> >     (snip)
> >
> >      I don't believe that the numbers 415-417 were issued. IIRC they came
> > into service as H3 - H5 with H1 and H2 being renumbered about the same time.
> >
> >     Gentlemen
> >     Despite LOA's shortcomings, I would have to support Leon on this one.
> >     The last 5 Ts were delivered as T413-417 although some may have had
> > their numbers changed by VR prior to commissioning.
> >     See June 1984 RD, shot of T415 on load trial on Short North.
>
> Yes but it is *prior* to their issuing to traffic.
>
> David.



--
- James Brook -

----------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail:
mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
Victorian Railfan Web Site:
http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
----------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you love your Mother...
Click Here
http://click.egroups.com/1/3653/5/_/_/_/957357136/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Ausloco-unsubscribe@egroups.com