[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Junee Triangle.

Subject: Re: Junee Triangle.
From: "BJ" <macgunzal@REMOVEbigpond.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:53:23 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
References: <mauried.434.37E062CF@commslab.gov.au> <7rpsr1$168$1@mirv.unsw.edu.au> <Dq%D3.15526$1E2.109269@ozemail.com.au>


Bill McNiven wrote in message ...
>When my PTC Local Appendix was printed in 1973, Junee North Jct. to Junee
>West Jct. was an Ordinary Staff section 0.644 Km long.  Tickets were not
>authorised for use in this section.
>


Not often that a train could be longer than the staff section that it
travels through!!! What happens if the tail of the train is still in the
section - should the driver surrender the staff???? A train could be sitting
across 3 staff sections!!!

(Sorry - rhetorical questions)....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Junee Triangle.
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@omni.com.au>

References:
- Junee Triangle.
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: Junee Triangle.
  - From: G.Lambert@unsw.edu.au (Geoff Lambert)
- Re: Junee Triangle.
  - From: "Bill McNiven" <wmcniven@gunzel.ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Junee Triangle.
Next by Date: Re: QR going national?
Prev by thread: Re: Junee Triangle.
Next by thread: Re: Junee Triangle.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread