Re: Submarine Stations (was Wolli Creek Station (NSW))

["Eric Cartman" <erk_cartman@yahoo.com>]

What about Redfern (platforms 1-10 above ground, 11-12 below)? What about
Sydney Central (platforms 1-23 above ground and 24-25 below - not to mention
the used platforms 26/27)?

Eric
www.webalias.com/erknet

Bill McNiven wrote in message <0TyN3.10762$D33.34692@ozemail.com.au>...
>OK experts!  If East Camberwell formerly had multiple levels, maybe Wolli
>Creek is the only two-level station with the lower lever below sea level!
>
>BTW, the only other Australian railway station I can find that is below sea
>level was Curdimurka at -10 ft. on the shores of Lake Eyre (according to
the
>1966 1:250000 map).
>
>Bill :)
>
>Roderick Smith wrote in message <01bf14a4$c2fcc240$1f2d11cb@rodsmith>...
>>If Bill has chosen the correct answer to Ronald's question,
>>there was a predecessor: East Camberwell, Victoria.
>>Bill McNiven <wmcniven@gunzel.ozemail.com.au> wrote in article
>>> Ronald BESDANSKY wrote in message ...
>>> >something about this station which is unique amongst
>>> >Australian railway stations, with the exception of some underground
>>> stations
>>> Well, AFAIK, it's the only station in Oz which is on two levels with the
>>> track alignments crossing in the middle of the station.  (So we need not
>>> debate whether Wolli Creek (Low) is underground or underwater.)
>
>
>