[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Out of Gauge Suburban EMU's in Sydney (Was DOO In Sydney)
- Subject: Re: Out of Gauge Suburban EMU's in Sydney (Was DOO In Sydney)
- From: craigd@lios.apana.org.au (C. Dewick)
- Date: 13 Oct 1999 23:45:03 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
- Organization: Lios - Children of the Light - May the Schwartz be With You
- References: <7slfj8$87f$1@news1.mpx.com.au>
In <3801AD28.E6345755@melbpc.org.au> John Duncan McCallum
<mccallum@melbpc.org.au> writes:
>> Melbourne already had rearview mirrors on trains. Sydney never has.
>> Tangarbages are right on the extremity of the loading gauge when
operating
>> in the medium width area. How do propose to solve this without
>> expensive-to-install retractable windows?
>When you say that the trains are right on the extremity of the loading
>gauge, how much room is there between the side of the train and lineside
>structures or trains on adjacent tracks?
I'm not sure, but there are actually two standards which have to co-relate
here - the loading gauge, which is the maximum volumetric space in which
rollingstock is permitted to occupy, and the structure gauge, which is the
same but keeps structures a pre-defined distance *back* from the maximum
limits of the complementary loading guage profile.
Regards,
Craig.
--
Craig Ian Dewick | Stand clear - jaws closing
Send email to craigd@lios.apana.org.au | Visit my Australian rail transport
Professional Train Driver, Cityrail | and rail modelling web site:
and HO scale rail modeller | http://lios.apana.org.au/~craigd