[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QR going national?
- Subject: Re: QR going national?
- From: "John McCandless" <johnmc@topend.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:35:09 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct
- References: <37ddf59e.0@news.topend.com.au> <38010cc7.3712187@news.ozemail.com.au> <37E0F9AF.B551E566@ozemail.com.au> <37faabc4.6669329@news.ozemail.com.au> <0vkE3.16148$1E2.118397@ozemail.com.au> <mauried.158.37E21B00@commslab.gov.au> <37e2440e@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <381428dd.4701931@news.ozemail.com.au> <37F82A96.41E81FAE@smartchat.net.au>
Rod Gayford <rjaygee@smartchat.net.au> wrote in message
37F82A96.41E81FAE@smartchat.net.au">news:37F82A96.41E81FAE@smartchat.net.au...
> For all the money spent on improvements on rail in Qld its still an
isolated
> narrow gauge system with severe loading gauge problems. By the way, has
Qld gone
> over to canted rails, or are they still persisting with vertical rail
which
> results in dreadful wheel and rail wear problems?
>
> Cheers
> RJG
I wonder how much adulation goes to standard gauge simply because it has the
positive sounding "standard" in it's name?
If the Romans had have made skinny chariots - 'standard gauge' is the width
of a 2-horse Roman war chariot - 3'6" wide, we may be having a different
conversation altogether! [Then again, Queensland would have probably said
that it couldn't afford 3' 6", and built all it's lines to 2' - we always do
things differently up here.... :-)]
Also, if you were a politician, and had a choice of building a 'standard'
gauge line, or a 'narrow' gauge line, which would you pick?
--
John McCandless
Never play leapfrog with a unicorn...
Cloncurry Qld Au