Re: Fatality at Ashfield

[wizzer1865@aol.com (Wizzer1865)]

>In the beginning you say "No, read my words", at the end you say "The trauma
>will not be
>as bad", so seeing through that contradiction the answer to my question is
>YES!
>
>Now, READ MY WORDS!
>
>I am not doubting the fact for one second that the truama the driver suffers
>is servere. I AGREE WITH YOU!!! My initial question to you was that did the
>guard suffer any truama at a fatality since you left the the guard out in
>your original post.
>So, at night,(or day for that matter) the driver hits something but doesn't
>know what it was. The guard has to take a walk to assertain what was hit,
>wouldn't he/she?. He/she does this and it happens to be a fatality. So, the
>driver didn't see the person or their expression but the guards sees all the
>bits and pieces and maybe even a person who is still alive. Going by what
>you have said this sort of fatality mustn't happen by the way you firmly
>made your point above.
>My suggestion to you is that truama is experienced by BOTH members of the
>train crew in ANY fatality but the level of truama of each member depends on
>the circumstances!

True, but what about here in Victoria where the driver is the only one on the
train, is his grief going to be more because he is doing the job of two people
or less because he is the only one.This is not a challenge simply a question
that is not being looked at from a different perspective.