[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3526? Anyone?

Subject: Re: 3526? Anyone?
From: keithm@commslab.gov.au (Dave Malcolm)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 22:44:17 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Dept of Communications LAB
References: <3769b29e.0@occy.pnc.com.au> <3769B2CB.6A44@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <7kckp9$3prbu$1@titan.xtra.co.nz> <3769DAAB.7656@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <3769E123.E819F394@mailbox.uq.edu.au> <3769e9a8.0@occy.pnc.com.au> <3769ECE9.71212BAA@zip.com.au>

In article <376A3179.69D125F1@fastlink.com.au> Railway Rasputin <bob@fastlink.com.au> writes:
>From: Railway Rasputin <bob@fastlink.com.au>
>Subject: Re: 3526? Anyone?
>Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 21:46:01 +1000



>Roy Marshall wrote:

>> I would say that judging by the replies there is, as usual, not much to
>> know. Bit like the 32 class appeal years ago...
>>

>I know this sounds like bullshit but just wait a bit and see whats happening.
>I'm the biggest cynic but the new GM seems to be organising things and getting
>things done.
>He wants a main line steam loco running plus a back up.
>Lets see how he performs

>rgds

Good, but which mainline steam loco?

Dave Malcolm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3526? Anyone?
  - From: Railway Rasputin <bob@fastlink.com.au>

References:
- 3526? Anyone?
  - From: "Darren Yates" <dyates@pnc.com.au>
- Re: 3526? Anyone?
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz>
- Re: 3526? Anyone?
  - From: "M.B. and C.M.McDonald" <michael.and.colleen.mcdonald@xtra.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: 3526? Anyone?
Next by Date: Re: Melbourne route 70 tram
Prev by thread: Re: 3526? Anyone?
Next by thread: Re: 3526? Anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread