Re: All Trains To Be Replaced

[The Good Doctor <cpopadopoulos@hotmail.com>]

And so you are holier than thou eh? What gives you the right you
pea-brained turd to insinutate, sorry, STATE that my comments were
stupid? Hmm? On what basis have you calculated that Professor Knob Gob?
On whatever basis though, you're still a biohazard who does nothing for
furthering the cause of public transport!

Stand up you cretin should you be concerned about our metro transit
system. If not, sink back into lollypop world at the back of the garden
from whence you came lowly peasent.

Con


David Proctor wrote:
> 
> Global Legend wrote in message <3756986E.BA277EA5@hotmail.com>...
> >Is not a person entitled to ones own opinion without being ridiculed by
> >a pompous genetic calamity such as yourself?
> 
> Not really - the comment you made was stupid.
> 
> "All trains should be replaced in Melbourne. They are too old"
> 
> The Comeng sets are approx. 15 years old (mid 80's I think) - they are not
> too old.
> 
> "too smelly,"
> 
> That is not a reason to replace trains - it is a reason to implement a
> better cleaning regime.
> 
> "and look awful."
> 
> Well, I suppose that IS a reason to replace trains - forget the fact that
> they do the job, we can't have ugly looking trains now, can we?"
> 
> DaveP
> 
> ------------------
> 
> I LOVE deadlines - I especially LOVE the swishing sound they make as they go
> flying by!