[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dorrigo
- Subject: Re: Dorrigo
- From: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 23:20:33 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <36876573.73DC@ozemail.com.au> <01be3333$ee820680$e8d66ccb@rodgayford> <368954de.0@job.acay.com.au> <36937363.8223120@news.magna.com.au> <76cqf8$125$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <368af7ac.1514440@news.bigpond.com> <76e65r$1gn$1@news.tmx.com.au> <368db9d7.2412915@news.magna.com.au> <76fg6v$4fq$1@news.tmx.com.au>
- Reply-To: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
"Trevor Edmonds" <tedmonds@tmx.com.au> wrote:
> Bill, you were the one that made the statement. You can back it up.
So, you aren't interested in answering a specific question. That's
answer enough in itself.
> What rollingstock at Dorrigo is derelect?
I'm not a member of Dorrigo, so you know its highly unlikely I could
answer that question.
I can't answer with specific examples, I just know what perception of
the whole "collection" I came away with.
> Messengers can be corrected when their message is crap.
There you go again, attacking the messenger but not addressing the
message. There's no point in continuing this.
Bill
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dorrigo
- From: "Trevor Edmonds" <tedmonds@tmx.com.au>