[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: y2k

Subject: Re: y2k
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: 2 Feb 1999 09:38:09 GMT
Followup-To: misc.transport.rail.australia-nz,aus.rail
Newsgroups: misc.transport.rail.australia-nz, aus.rail
Organization: Customer of OzEmail/Access One Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
References: <01be4e73$42ff8480$cc2d11cb@rodsmith> <36B6C245.48F13975@bigfoot.com>

Notagunzel (notagunzel@bigfoot.com) wrote:
> Of course, there has been no suggestion of y2k problems with mechanical
> interlocking frames! :o)

Well they seemed to function without any problems when we ticked over to
1900. :)

Cheers
David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: y2k
  - From: pcc@ocean.com.au (Les Brown)

References:
- y2k
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: y2k
  - From: Notagunzel <notagunzel@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ARTC Vic Train Control
Next by Date: Interesting Occurance
Prev by thread: Re: y2k
Next by thread: Re: y2k
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread