[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brisbane Light Rail
- Subject: Re: Brisbane Light Rail
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 03:27:34 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <36AD108A.70B7BBD1@uq.net.au> <36AD2266.31CF@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <36AD7BC4.D4452395@uq.net.au> <36ADA840.7F1198E9@merddyn.apana.org.au> <36AE3A53.570E8145@mailbox.uq.edu.au> <36AED28F.E0A01E53@enternet.com.au> <36af18b1.3569116@news.ocean.com.au> <78ol3s$f3d$7@news.mel.aone.net.au> <36aff71d.35829510@news.mpx.com.au> <36b10234.0@139.134.5.33> <36b287d0.1660587@news.mpx.com.au> <78u6o8$he5$1@news.mel.aone.net.au> <78umt2$epe$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36b47578.0@news.highway1.com.au>
- Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
David & Jan Winter wrote:
> My dad used to insist that the minumum length for a
> train was 3 vehicles. 2 would be a "unit" or "motor-trailer" or, in road
> terms a tractor-trailer. I suppose I agree with him, even if it is little
> untidy.
IIRC, the General Appendix defines a train as any vehicle running on the railway
system, be it a light locomotive, a rail bus, or a coal train.
I must see if I can get an exact quote when I am more awake. :-)
--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/