[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options

Subject: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
From: andreew@postone.com (Andrew Yeung)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:34:53 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail,rec.aviation.military
Organization: Singapore Telecommunications Ltd
References: <Yzi74.30$M94.450878@news0.optus.net.au> <385e740f.2914728@news.singnet.com.sg> <83mcsa$bvl$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <385f0738.3870158@news.singnet.com.sg> <83n6au$ci7$1@news1.mpx.com.au>

On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:21:33 +1100, "L'acrobat"
<sibehusky@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>Frequently it's modified for local conditions.

A probe for an F-111 can't really differ can it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: Jackson Harding <jaxsonjo@camtech.net.au>
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: "L'acrobat" <sibehusky@optusnet.com.au>

References:
- RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: andreew@postone.com (Andrew Yeung)
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: "L'acrobat" <sibehusky@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: andreew@postone.com (Andrew Yeung)
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: "L'acrobat" <sibehusky@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Sydney rail system sucks?!?!?!?
Next by Date: Re: Sydney rail system sucks?!?!?!?
Prev by thread: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
Next by thread: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread