[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options

Subject: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
From: "L'acrobat" <sibehusky@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:07:01 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail,rec.aviation.military
Organization: Optus Internet
References: <Yzi74.30$M94.450878@news0.optus.net.au> <385e740f.2914728@news.singnet.com.sg>


Andrew Yeung <andreew@postone.com> wrote in message
385e740f.2914728@news.singnet.com.sg">news:385e740f.2914728@news.singnet.com.sg...
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 04:50:00 GMT, dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David
> Bromage) wrote:
>
> Why don't they just take an off-the-shelf option? Rather than
> reinventing the wheel the Americans invented some time back.

Off the shelf options are great if you work on the same shelf.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: andreas@baloney.org (Harry Andreas)
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: andreew@postone.com (Andrew Yeung)

References:
- RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
  - From: andreew@postone.com (Andrew Yeung)

Prev by Date: Re: [Vic] Tram & Pedestrian Accident Today
Next by Date: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
Prev by thread: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
Next by thread: Re: RAAF considers aerial refuelling options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread