[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: conditions as train operators

Subject: Re: conditions as train operators
From: Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 09:54:32 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: University of Queensland
References: <38486def_3@news1.vip.uk.com> <uhbj4s8eehbepb5khkk815ck3rld3cl00d@4ax.com>

Kingpin wrote:

> > I WOULD BE GRATEFUL IF YOU COULD HELP ME, ALSO HOW DO YOU GET JOBS AS
> > OPERATORS AND HOW HAVE THINGS CHANGED IN THE LAST FEW YEARS.

> I'm sorry, Australian railways do not hire people who shout all the time.

Correct. You need a demonstrated ability to mumble inchorenetly.

-- 
Robert Kearey                   Remote Access Group
ITS                             University of Queensland
Sentence fragment               I don't speak for my employer
"This message double-encrypted with ROT-13 for your protection"

References:
- conditions as train operators
  - From: "minitel" <minitel@arsenalfc.net>
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: Kingpin <kingpin1@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Train Accident in Blue Mountains
Next by Date: Mystery Loco in USA, help please?
Prev by thread: Re: conditions as train operators
Next by thread: Re: conditions as train operators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread