Re: Derailment at OLYMPIC PARK.

["WhaleOilBeefHooked" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>]

Stuart Ellis <mpp@zipworld.com.au> wrote in message
37D240C0.94A02FC6@zipworld.com.au">news:37D240C0.94A02FC6@zipworld.com.au...
> Don Allitt wrote:
>
> > Where did the bi-directional come from?? Read it again.Then if you are
still
> > haveing trouble understanding i will draw a map and post it by snail
mail.
> > Don.
> >
> > WhaleOilBeefHooked wrote:
> >
> > > Don Allitt <nahgfa@zeta.org.au> wrote in message
> > > 37D10DDA.EC0A088@zeta.org.au">news:37D10DDA.EC0A088@zeta.org.au...
> > > > Only goes to strengthen my posting on the 28/8/99 re Rugby clash
atest
> > > match for transport. Or
> > > > "I told you so"
> > > > Don.
> > >
> > > What, the fact that they are able to run bi-directional on both roads,
so
> > > they can run a train in, terminate, then run it out the same way? You
told
> > > us nothing of the sort.
> > >
> > > DaveP
>
> How about working under the signalers instructions, yard working. I
actually
> worked the other  service into Olympic Park during the derailment (6
times). No
> problems, just worked under the signalers instructions.  we crossed over
near
> where the line passes over the western freeway, proceeded wrong road,  and
> proceeded to the platform under the above mentioned yard working rules.
The
> term bi directional is not applicable, anywhere under Strathfields'
control.

I was not referring to the signalling system, I was referring to the
practice of running in both directions on the one track.

DaveP