Re: Derailment at OLYMPIC PARK.

[Stuart Ellis <mpp@zipworld.com.au>]

Don Allitt wrote:

> Where did the bi-directional come from?? Read it again.Then if you are still
> haveing trouble understanding i will draw a map and post it by snail mail.
> Don.
>
> WhaleOilBeefHooked wrote:
>
> > Don Allitt <nahgfa@zeta.org.au> wrote in message
> > 37D10DDA.EC0A088@zeta.org.au">news:37D10DDA.EC0A088@zeta.org.au...
> > > Only goes to strengthen my posting on the 28/8/99 re Rugby clash atest
> > match for transport. Or
> > > "I told you so"
> > > Don.
> >
> > What, the fact that they are able to run bi-directional on both roads, so
> > they can run a train in, terminate, then run it out the same way? You told
> > us nothing of the sort.
> >
> > DaveP

How about working under the signalers instructions, yard working. I actually
worked the other  service into Olympic Park during the derailment (6 times). No
problems, just worked under the signalers instructions.  we crossed over near
where the line passes over the western freeway, proceeded wrong road,  and
proceeded to the platform under the above mentioned yard working rules.  The
term bi directional is not applicable, anywhere under Strathfields' control.

I hope this helps

Stuart Ellis