[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another RSA worker killed
- Subject: Re: Another RSA worker killed
- From: Bill <wguest@xtra.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 23:51:25 +1200
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Customer of Telecom Internet Services
- References: <7nrimh$tra$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37a49b0f.2385467@news.ozemail.com.au> <37A2CE5C.4F2C9039@xtra.co.nz> <37A40400.D124C083@fastlink.com.au>
Railway Rasputin wrote:
<My (Bill's) original response snipped>
> You can't protect people from themselves. You can train them and
> train them and train them.
> No matter how much you train them there will still be those that
> don't conform or are laxed. So unless you employ more people to
> police them you will still get the occasional fatality.
> A good example of this is with train crew, some still refuse to
> wear the orange saftey vest no matter what you do. Yet this is a
> simple task.
>
If workers will not obey safety rules, they should be warned, and
if the desired behaviour is not obtained, they should be
dismissed! I remember seeing a sign in the BNSF yard at Barstow,
California, 5 years ago:
"Safe Working is a Condition of Your Employment"
And they meant it!
Here in NZ, the Employment Court recently upheld the right of an
employer to sack a worker who consistently refused to follow a
safety procedure "Because it was too much trouble".
Bill