[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Signalling in Victoria
- Subject: Re: Signalling in Victoria
- From: "Notagunzel" <notagunzel@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 22:41:42 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Terrible Trains Corp.
- References: <7dmc6c$3a7$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <19990328184153.04346.00001467@ng-fu1.aol.com> <7dn3b2$jkt$2@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <hnGL2.212$wC4.1995@nswpull.telstra.net> <370A0E27.1A415C9@ancc.com.au>
- Reply-To: "Notagunzel" <notagunzel@bigfoot.com>
David Langley <del@ancc.com.au> wrote in message
370A0E27.1A415C9@ancc.com.au">news:370A0E27.1A415C9@ancc.com.au...
> I agree about the light disc signal, they are not dwarf signals. I think
the
> term dwarf has size conotations.
> A light signal with a light for a shunting move is said to have a light
disc.
> And the signal would be a 2 pos one. A 3 pos sig would have a low speed
signal.
They are currently a 2 pos dwarf on the same post as a 2 pos Home, according
to the rules. As to what they were referred to as when first installed?
They certainly ain't currently known as a light disc, although they
effectively are the same.