[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Melbourne Trams
- Subject: Re: Melbourne Trams
- From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 09:56:00 +1200
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Remove REMOVE to reply
- References: <709865$pga$1@toto.tig.com.au> <709p3d$gvd$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <70a4i2$s65$7@news.mel.aone.net.au> <70bect$km6$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <3629577E.55BE@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <908719423.670122@woody.hotkey.net.au> <362AD4CF.723F@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <70h92g$mvt$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <362C7D3B.3ED93751@ozemail.com.au> <70icjp$3hg$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <362e7be0.0@139.134.5.33> <909065804.900595@woody.hotkey.net.au>
- Xref: news.mel.aone.net.au aus.rail:34251
Michael Walker wrote:
>
> >I like the idea of making the Bs longer with a low floor section in the
> >middle.
> >
> Problem with this is you have one short low floor section with step ups to
> the two original halves. This probably, whilst adding some access to some
> people, actually discourages and makes inconvenient access for others.
Pardon me for disagreeing, but this kind of solution is very common in
Europe. I have seen trams in a number of cities where a new low-floor
section was inserted in the middle of a formerly single-articulated tram.
IIRC, the first city to do this was Basel in Switzerland, at least, that
was where I first rode such a tram (in 1992). There were no problems with
boarding, alighting or anything else.
As various people have said, however, the greatest need in Melbourne is
for new low-floor trams, to replace the Ws, the worst Zs and allow for
route expansion.
David McLoughlin
Auckland New Zealand
Reporter: "Mr President, was Monica lying?"
Clinton: No, she was kneeling."