[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does NR know about this?




----------
In article <72m2tq$4qr$3@news.mel.aone.net.au>, dbromage@fang.omni.com.au
(David Bromage) wrote:


athan (athan@trump.net.au) wrote:
> Australian courts, funnily enough, will make their decisions based on
> AUSTRALIAN and QLD/NSW/VIC/SA/WA law - and WILL NOT have regard to US law
-
> they MAY make reference to US findings on material matters, such as
studies
> relating to fatigue, etc, but the US law will have NO bearing.

Overseas court rulings may be pursuasive, but are not binding.

Cheers
David

Actually, I didn't write that at all.  Tasmania is a state of Australia.  I
would have included it- unless you think that we qualify as being overseas,
and therefore, not binding.

Athan