[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does NR know about this?
----------
In article <72m2tq$4qr$3@news.mel.aone.net.au>, dbromage@fang.omni.com.au
(David Bromage) wrote:
athan (athan@trump.net.au) wrote:
> Australian courts, funnily enough, will make their decisions based on
> AUSTRALIAN and QLD/NSW/VIC/SA/WA law - and WILL NOT have regard to US law
-
> they MAY make reference to US findings on material matters, such as
studies
> relating to fatigue, etc, but the US law will have NO bearing.
Overseas court rulings may be pursuasive, but are not binding.
Cheers
David
Actually, I didn't write that at all. Tasmania is a state of Australia. I
would have included it- unless you think that we qualify as being overseas,
and therefore, not binding.
Athan