[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Prototype proceedures

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Prototype proceedures
From: "Peter J. Vincent" <pjv@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 14:18:52 -0700
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: DataPix
References: <01bd8a34$799ce5e0$3d5b868b@ronald> <1998052818290700.OAA10168@ladder01.news.aol.com>

MarkBau1 wrote:
> 
> First of all the crew would be considered guilty until proven innocent. The
> crew would be immeadiatly stood down, the signalman or train controller however
> would probably keep working.
> 
> After a while there would be an internal investigation by the railway, the
> point of which would be to confirm the crews guilt. If eveidence came up that
> could be verified by at least 6 independent sources the crew may get off. Any
> signalling staff would automatically be absolved because their signalling
> systems are 100% fail safe.
> 
> Mark.
> 
> THE ROCK is dead
> Long live THE ROCK!

Yeah! Remember the driver in the Laverton smash (1978). Very experienced
but nobody believed him or the second person the signal aspect they both
saw!!

References:
- RE: Prototype proceedures
  - From: markbau1@aol.com (MarkBau1)

Prev by Date: Re: Road spending campaign.
Next by Date: Re: Clyde Open Day
Prev by thread: RE: Prototype proceedures
Next by thread: Re: Prototype proceedures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread