[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 44211

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: 44211
From: Bob <gioia@fastlink.com.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 01:42:00 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Microplex Pty Ltd
References: <6eri75$805$1@nswpull.telstra.net> <351246FA.AC0C7BC0@klever.net.au> <3519B66F.54A5@planet.net.au> <3519C54C.850D37A7@ozemail.com.au>

David Johnson wrote:

Goodwin Alco wrote:
> Your statement would suggest that 44211 is to be a heritage unit, is
> this the case?
If it is, will it be treated like heritage unit 4638?

How might that be? Maybe a free paintjob and limmited use because of the expensive hiring charges.Oh yes, and lets not forget 4401, the same applies with it.Bob

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 44211
  - From: Goodwin Alco <alco@planet.net.au>

References:
- 44211
  - From: "tezza" <tezza@atinet.com.au>
- Re: 44211
  - From: Eben Levy <ebenlevy@klever.net.au>
- Re: 44211
  - From: Goodwin Alco <alco@planet.net.au>
- Re: 44211
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: 44211
Next by Date: Re: Freight is booming
Prev by thread: Re: 44211
Next by thread: Re: 44211
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread