[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "B" for Bayside.

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: "B" for Bayside.
From: "Chris Brownbill" <cbrnbill@enternet.com.au>
Date: 29 Jul 1998 13:10:06 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: .
References: <6pcpci$hnv$1@toto.tig.com.au> <35BDFCB5.770508E9@hotmail.com> <6plmb7$85b@news.microsoft.com> <35BE72D3.21C@iprolink.co.nz>

David McLoughlin <davemcl@iprolink.co.nz> wrote in article
<35BE72D3.21C@iprolink.co.nz>...
> Michael Alexander wrote:
> 
> > I personally believe that the brand image of "The Met" should be
retained,
> > with only a small indication of who is actually running the service
(like
> > the little stickers which have apeared on the trams lately).
> > 
> 
> But think of all the money the consultant leeches who prey upon name 
> changes and sales of public infrastructure would miss out on.
> 

Where would we be without the wonderful people who gave us the terms
Bayside Trains and Hillside Trains?  I can hardly wait until they set to
work on coming up with a new name for the privatised V/line.  How about
Hayside Trains?

References:
- "B" for Bayside.
  - From: "Michael Kurkowski" <simcard@tig.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Melbourne - Metcard validation before every trip
Next by Date: Re 600 class in Victoria
Prev by thread: Re: "B" for Bayside.
Next by thread: Re: "B" for Bayside.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread