[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes in Melbourne

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Changes in Melbourne
From: billbolton@REMOVE-TO-EMAILacslink.net.au (Bill Bolton)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 05:49:22 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <34BB172D.C3E07C2@ugrad.unimelb.edu.au> <69koft$eio$1@eplet.mira.net.au> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980116211828.17753A-100000@eastwood.apana.org.au> <01bd22bb$8128b7c0$044a23cb@locxvcym> <34c9fb58.11024506@news.bigpond.com> <34c25b70.0@news.iprolink.co.nz> <34c798a1.2583851@news.bigpond.com> <34c2b15f.0@news.iprolink.co.nz>
Reply-To: billbolton@REMOVE-TO-EMAILacslink.net.au (Bill Bolton)

Dave McL <davemcl@-DR*P-iprolink.co.nz> wrote:

> It wasn't me who suggested the idea, I was merely pointing out it was 
> practical. The schedule could no doubt easily be drawn up to keep the 
> second crew shuttling their train back and forth to either Belgrave or 
> Lilydale. 

If its "practical" and "no doubt easily be drawn up", then how about
demonstrating how it would be done with saving in crew costs?

Cheers,

Bill

Bill Bolton
Sydney, Australia

References:
- Changes in Melbourne
  - From: Chris Gordon <c.gordon@ugrad.unimelb.edu.au>
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: dbowen@custard.net.#SPAMTRAP#.au (Daniel Bowen)
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: Mick Stock <mzs@eastwood.apana.org.au>
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@bigfoot.com>
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: billbolton@REMOVE-TO-EMAILacslink.net.au (Bill Bolton)
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: Dave McL <davemcl@-DR*P-iprolink.co.nz>
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: billbolton@REMOVE-TO-EMAILacslink.net.au (Bill Bolton)
- Re: Changes in Melbourne
  - From: Dave McL <davemcl@-DR*P-iprolink.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: Metcard Implementation
Next by Date: Re: what is a 38"s theoretical top speed?
Prev by thread: Re: Changes in Melbourne
Next by thread: Re: Changes in Melbourne
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread