Re: Why should NZ train driver take the blame

Ron Howship (howshr@netlink.com.au)
Sun, 15 Feb 1998 12:10:12 GMT

On Sun, 15 Feb 1998 02:05:01 +1300, "Terry Bill"
<e.richards@clear.net.nz> wrote:

"cut"
>
>The train got to the end of the trip Papakura, But unfortunately the story
>did not end, Passengers were handing the Driver all types of abuse (Just as
>if it was his fault he stop the train) I could not help feel sorry for the
>driver, So when I got home I rang the Newspaper "New Zealand Herald" as
>soon as I told the reporter the train failed he hung up on me, So I rang
>back only to be put on a answer machine, OK there is something funny going
>on here (and I am not laughing) So I waited a few minutes and rang back with
>a different approach, this time I get some one else who listened to me, but
>he did not find the story interesting (feeling sorry for the drivers)
>
>I can not help thinking afterwards, if I had of got the second reporter the
>first time, I would not have thought any more about my call to the newspaper
>or about the train breaking down, But why did the first reporter hung up on
>me & why did I get a answer machine the second time I rang back. COULD IT
>BE THAT NEW ZEALAND HERALD IS GETTING SICK OF PEOPLE RINGING IN TO SAY "THE
>TRAINS HAVE BROKEN DOWN?" or is there even more to it than that ?

Sounds to me like a well known disease that train commuters have "See
A Head Kick It".
I have been on the recieving end of this disease on many occasions.
Symtoms are:
Red face followed by puffed up shoulders.
Treatment: Apoligise for the delay.
If that treatment doesn't work the patient suffers "Waving arm
syndrome".
Treatment: Again be humble and apoligise again.
If that doesn't work, tell em to "piss off and tell someone who
cares".