[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vic Tangaras

Subject: Re: Vic Tangaras
From: "Ron Bennell" <ron.bennell@qr.com.au>
Date: 6 Dec 1998 22:48:27 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Who Knows
References: <74ds62$6lj$6@news.mel.aone.net.au> <19981206124024.20298.00002983@ng147.aol.com>



MarkBau1 <markbau1@aol.comQQQQyuk> wrote in article
<19981206124024.20298.00002983@ng147.aol.com>...
> 
> I'll call it a 4D if you call Victorian sparks by their proper name,
"sparks"
> and stop using that silly pommy gunzel term "emu's"
> 


Maybe you are on a limb here Mark.

While "spark" was the common term used in some discussions, E-M-U was the
term often used in technical areas of Victorian Railways

Regards
-- 
Ron Bennell
ron.bennell@qr.com.au

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: Tony Gatt <tgatt@eisa.net.au>

References:
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: dbromage@omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: markbau1@aol.comQQQQyuk (MarkBau1)

Prev by Date: Re: New timber mill at Tumut
Next by Date: Re: The Ghan
Prev by thread: Re: Vic Tangaras
Next by thread: Re: Vic Tangaras
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread