Re: Driver Fatigue

Tell (telljb@ozemail.com.au)
Thu, 30 Apr 1998 02:37:23 GMT

mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly) wrote in part:
>Blaming drivers for rail accidents is and probably will always be a convenient
>copout for rail administrations who really dont want to do anything to improve
>safety on their railways.
>It staggers me that in 1998 that we still have safeworking systems comprising
>signals which do NOTHING to stop a train if it goes past the red signal.
>At least in the good old suburban areas we have the train stops.

Agreed Maurie, and there is the problem of trains that
are scheduled to cross another and head into a switch
set for the crossing loop at 100 clicks or so.?
It is a bit late too try and stop it then, you would
need to extend the system so that trains would be
detected several Km's away from the crossing loop and
if a driver does not acknowledge the warning, a full
brake application is made to prevent the thing
barrelling into the loop at high speed.
This happened last year out on the Trans and resulted
in a very expensive pile up.!

An automatic train control system with a modern CTC
installation would cost big money, considering the
number of crossing loops between Melbourne - Adelaide -
Perth. Given that the Feds have contributed peanuts to
the national rail network as distinct from NRC, I can
not see them funding a project of this magnitude.

If the user pays principle is applied, the rail access
charges will sky rocket and put rail even further
behind the road transport industry.

----Tell
Alice Springs NT