Re: Driver Fatigue

Tezza (tezza@atinet.com.au)
Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:41:08 +1000

David Johnson wrote in message <35474D10.E078B5A3@ozemail.com.au>...
>Tezza wrote:
>> Maurie Daly wrote in message ...
>> >It staggers me that in 1998 that we still have safeworking systems
>> comprising signals which do NOTHING to stop a train if it goes past the
red signal.
>> >At least in the good old suburban areas we have the train stops.

>> Which do absolutely nothing to stop a freight train from crashing into a
>> passenger train. It's only good luck that this has never happened.

>It has, on a number of occasions. One such occasion was Liverpool station,
1965.

I should have stipulated recently I suppose. I don't know if I'd even seen a
train by 1965. What was the outcome?

>But don't forget, that the trip will only stop a train, not hold it there.

Won't stop a freight train.

>At Como some months back, a train tripped past the signal at stop, kept
>coming and hit the train in front.

Just reset did he? Like that punch drunk idiot at Strahfield/Ashfield last
year (year before?)

>Apparently the driver had been on the train for 9 hours without a break.

Lucky he wasn't on a freighter, 10 or more hours on.

>Whilst it was only low speed, it shows that nothing is better at preventing
accidents than a vigilent >and alert driver.

There still needs to be a failsafe system to stop the train. One of these
days there's gonna be a US postal worker type flip out and do some real
damage.