Re: Responses to Postings

tezza (tezza@atinet.com.au)
Sun, 19 Apr 1998 20:54:39 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Walker: "Re: Victorian Budget - Minister for Transport Media Release"
Previous message: Frank Jones: "Re: WCR, firmly chained to the public pork trough"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Neve: "Responses to Postings"
Next in thread: B.G.R.: "Re: Responses to Postings"

peter berrett wrote in message <3539AC4E.448D@tbsa.com.au>...
>Pete wrote
>
>> G'day.
>>
>> Could someone explain to me why most respondees to postings insist on
>> repeating the whole of the original text?
>>
>> Not only does it waste space, it takes up time having to get through
>> it to read the replies!
>>
>> And, i just wonder how many respondees will repeat the whole of this
>> message in their comments!!!
>>
>> Pete.
>
>hat coudl never happen on this newsgroup Peter
>
>cheers peter

I suppose, it's cause they're too lazy to delete it :-)

Seriously, sometimes it's relevant, sometimes i't's not, but it's not as bad
here as in other NG's where each post can be 10 or 12k as they don't delete
anything.

Next message: Michael Walker: "Re: Victorian Budget - Minister for Transport Media Release"
Previous message: Frank Jones: "Re: WCR, firmly chained to the public pork trough"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Neve: "Responses to Postings"
Next in thread: B.G.R.: "Re: Responses to Postings"