Re: Patricks Train

tezza (tezza@atinet.com.au)
Sat, 11 Apr 1998 17:35:03 +1000

Eben Levy wrote in message <352E5BBC.B0E23493@klever.net.au>...
>
>
>tezza wrote:
>
>> Eben Levy wrote in message <352E47F3.BDFA674C@klever.net.au>...

>> >Why won't people just be happy that they have job?

>> There's not much point having a job if it doesn't pay enough to buy a
>> house and feed your family.

>Well, it's not my fualt people get married and have children and get a
>morgage. That's why I am lucky I am single.

"I'm alright, fuck you Jack", eh?

>> >> Tell us then - how many hours did he work and how much was he
paid.
>> It's not an invasion of his privacy as we don't know who he is. A
Driver
>> can also get $70,000 pa (old rates) if he works enough overtime,
weekends
>> >> etc.

>> >Yes it does. He has only given consent for Dave to read his pay
check,
>> not for him to post it on the net, even without names. It still comes
under
>> the privacy act.

>> >> >This orientation was not for new delegates - it was for EVERY new
>> >> employee with Patrick - if I was going to work there as a payroll
>> clerk, telephonist, etc., I would have to go on an MUA orientation
course,
>> paid for by the employer - that is WRONG!

>> >> Depends, what's involved in the course?

>> >A crock of shit.

>> What's involved that makes it a crock of shit?

>That it is a course that must be attended at the emplyers expanse

As usual you're full of it and won't answer a question. You're arguing
purely for the sake of an argument - you have nothing to contribute.