> Eben Levy wrote in message <352E5BBC.B0E23493@klever.net.au>...
> >
> >
> >tezza wrote:
> >
> >> Eben Levy wrote in message <352E47F3.BDFA674C@klever.net.au>...
>
> >> >Why won't people just be happy that they have job?
>
> >> There's not much point having a job if it doesn't pay enough to buy a
> >> house and feed your family.
>
> >Well, it's not my fualt people get married and have children and get a
> >morgage. That's why I am lucky I am single.
>
> "I'm alright, fuck you Jack", eh?
What was this in aid of?
Please, watch the language. there is no need for it. It does not offend me
but it makes you look like a person with a limited vocablurary
>
>
> >> >> Tell us then - how many hours did he work and how much was he
> paid.
> >> It's not an invasion of his privacy as we don't know who he is. A
> Driver
> >> can also get $70,000 pa (old rates) if he works enough overtime,
> weekends
> >> >> etc.
>
> >> >Yes it does. He has only given consent for Dave to read his pay
> check,
> >> not for him to post it on the net, even without names. It still comes
> under
> >> the privacy act.
>
> >> >> >This orientation was not for new delegates - it was for EVERY new
> >> >> employee with Patrick - if I was going to work there as a payroll
> >> clerk, telephonist, etc., I would have to go on an MUA orientation
> course,
> >> paid for by the employer - that is WRONG!
>
> >> >> Depends, what's involved in the course?
>
> >> >A crock of shit.
>
> >> What's involved that makes it a crock of shit?
>
> >That it is a course that must be attended at the emplyers expanse
>
> As usual you're full of it and won't answer a question. You're arguing
> purely for the sake of an argument - you have nothing to contribute.
You was doing the same to me. Also many poeple will say the same thing about
you. I have made my point and will defend it untill the end.
-- Bye for now, Eben.