Re: AN Loco Classifications

John McCallum (mccallum@melbpc.org.au)
Fri, 21 Nov 1997 23:13:00 GMT

In article <01bcf634$ac34b940$0402b5ca@locxvcym>, "david proctor" <daproc@fl.net.au> wrote:

>
>Fancy having an ALF class? One can understand the decision to reclassify
>the CL's into CLP and CLF, although it begs the question that if the CLP's
>were rebuilt as freight locos, would they become CLFP's?

No, They would become CLFs.

>The simplest system is that adopted by NSW and Victoria, although my own
>personal preference is for NSW - this may have something to do with the
>fact that I live there.

I agree on the preference for the NSW (and SAR) classification system, although NSWGR did muck it up
with the 421, 422 and 442 classes.

John McCallum.