Re: Old Timer on Sydney Light Rail

Phil Bertram (pbertram@pipeline.com.au)
Mon, 07 Jul 1997 20:40:12 +1000

Bill Bolton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Jun 1997 23:43:46 +1100, Carolyn Neumann
> <neumannc@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> > under the SLR's rather unique overhead.
>
> There doesn't appear to be anything particularly "unique" about the
> SLRs overhead construction as far as I can see, it's a normal
> pantograph set up. Would you care to elucidate your comment?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
> Bill Bolton billbolton@acslink.net.au
> Sydney, Australia

Bill,
Yes the overhead does appear to be for normal pantograph operation,
however what is different is that; double contact wire has been hung. I
am not sure of the reasoning for this maybe someone else can provide the
answer, it may have something to do with better pick up for the 750V dc
taction current. I have noted new overseas Light Rail systems also using
double contact wire as well. (Indeed the SRA uses this method for high
current demand sections such as coal lines)Aside from Melbourne which
has sucessfully combined panto and trolley pole operation, the sydney
system is exclusivly panto only.