[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Olympic Loop

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Olympic Loop
From: alberta@zip.com.au (Albert Alcoceba)
Date: 30 Dec 1997 15:11:10 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: <insert smart-ass comment about messy desks here>
References: <34A65632.29122F7E@fastlink.com.au>
Reply-To: alberta@zip.com.au

In the message about  Olympic Loop, from GIOIA@FASTLINK.COM.AU to ALL!, GIOIA@FASTLINK.COM.AU said:"

GG>    When there is no guard watching out on the "unprotected" side there
GG> are 16 doors of an 8 car set to look after. How many staff would you
GG> need to protect the "chuckleheads" from trying to force the doors open
GG> as the train mooves off?

Honestly... I don't see the issue here... why is it harder for one guard to
look after 16 doors being forced open when only one platform face is
present... compared to one platform assistant on a platform where the guard
is not looking?



Regards,

Albert.


 * RM 1.31  * Albert! alberta@zip.com.au http://www.zip.com.au/~alberta/

References:
- Re: Olympic Loop
  - From: Bob <gioia@fastlink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Fish & Chip(s)
Next by Date: Re: What happened to the 73 class locos.
Prev by thread: Re: Olympic Loop
Next by thread: Re: Olympic Loop
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread