Re: Olympic Loop

[Bob <gioia@fastlink.com.au>]

Eben Levy wrote:

> Bob wrote:
>
> > Albert Alcoceba wrote:
> >
> > > In the message about  Olympic Loop, from GIOIA@FASTLINK.COM.AU to
> > > ALL!, GIOIA@FASTLINK.COM.AU said:"
> > >
> > > GG> Sounds good in theory but who is responsibe for the chuckle
> head
> > > that
> > > GG> tries to open the doors on the opposite side to the guard,
> gets
> > > stuck
> > > GG> half in and half out as the train mooves off and gets killed.
> > >
> > > Provide staff on the platforms to look after this.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Albert.
> > >
> > >  * RM 1.31  * Albert! alberta@zip.com.au
> > > http://www.zip.com.au/~alberta/
> >
> >    When there is no guard watching out on the "unprotected" side
> there
> > are 16 doors of an 8 car set to look after. How many staff would you
>
> > need to protect the "chuckleheads" from trying to force the doors
> open
> > as the train mooves off?
> >                                 Bob
>
> But what stops them from doing it now?  The guard will have to close
> the
> exit side doors first and then the entrance side, how hard is that?
>
> --
> Bye for now,
> Eben
>
> http://www.klever.net.au/~ebenlevy/

   At the moment we have no two sided platforms. If we are going to have
them now we need to have a policy and safety standard for their use. I'm
sure the DOT will want something.