> Craig Haber wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in the thoughts of rail photographers about the
> pros/cons
> > of 400 ISO film. I've
>
> > Do any other photographers have any suggestions/experiences they can
>
> > share with me? I
>
> I ran off about 20 rolls of 400 ASA film about 5 years ago, and
> decided
> to stop using it. I have found with experimentation that Fuji 200 ASA
> 36
> exposure film is the best for railway photography. I have now been
> using
> it for 5 years and taken about 500 rolls of it.
>
> --
> David Johnson - Rail Services Authority
I have used Fuji 100, 200 and 400 quite a lot, and found no significant
differences between any of them. The only reason I use the 400 is in
the middle of winter when the light is generally poorer. The 400 does
go a little bit grainy, but that is only in *really* low light, when
sensible photographers should be driving home.
Cheers,
Peter H
-- This is not an opinion of the Pichi Richi Railway, just the personal comments of the author, who is the Treasurer. http://www.prrps.com.au