[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [melb] Citadis compared to B2 Class

Subject: Re: [melb] Citadis compared to B2 Class
From: Dave Proctor <david@sd3.mailbank.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 07:26:32 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <slrn9hbs7d.18g.spammers-will-die@amalthea.dark.net>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:38203

On 31 May 2001 17:21:44 +1000, spammers-will-die@austux.net (Jeremy
Lunn) wrote:

>I am just curious how Citadis compare to B2 as far as size goes.  The
>specs I saw on the web somewhere said 23 metres in length and that was
>it.  B2s are around the same length right?  If they are the same length
>then why are they articulated in two places?  And are they much wider? 

Sydney's are articulated in four places.

Dave

References:
- [melb] Citadis compared to B2 Class
  - From: spammers-will-die@austux.net (Jeremy Lunn)

Prev by Date: [melb] Citadis compared to B2 Class
Next by Date: Re: [NSW] 4GT
Prev by thread: [melb] Citadis compared to B2 Class
Next by thread: Re: [melb] Citadis compared to B2 Class
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread