[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NSW-sort of] Millennium Train & Sex???
- Subject: Re: [NSW-sort of] Millennium Train & Sex???
- From: "Brendan" <nadnerb_2000@nospam.start.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 21:25:13 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <Pr_J6.3057$ZJ.115754@ozemail.com.au> <3AF87CDE.E1B97770@mail.usyd.edu.au> <9da0vm$csb@nntpa.cb.lucent.com> <3AF8A349.CE6E141C@mail.usyd.edu.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:37051
"Greg Rudd" <grudd@mail.usyd.edu.au> wrote in message
news:3AF8A349.CE6E141C@mail.usyd.edu.au...
>
>
> Peter Homann wrote:
>
> > Greg Rudd wrote:
> > >
> > > My question is, does the use of the artist's impression of the 4gt
contravene
> > > copyright? And secondly will State Rail take action. Seeing that
they screamed
> > > copyright violation when those graffiti artists used the City Rail
network map
> > > on their web site.
> >
> > IMHO if the paper took their own photo, then altered it to suit
> > themselves, CityRail would have about as much argument as with any
> > gunz^H^H^H^Hphotographer who takes a photo, then sells it (for example)
> > for inclusion in a calendar.
> >
>
> Looking at the paper it did look like they did use the artists impression
I have seen
> on State Rail official documents.
I've heard you can alter others images and call it your own (please correct
if wrong). It could also be possible that The Aussie asked permission
>
> >
> > It's a lot different to the graffiti bozo's who (I presume) simply
> > copied the graphic from the CityRail web site. *That* is breach of
> > copyright; modifying your own photo is not: you gave yourself permission
> > to do it.
> >
> > I guess the only grounds for complaint would be if CityRail felt the
> > image was defamatory.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > ============================
> > Peter Homann
> > ============================
> > The light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off
> > until economic conditions improve. Management.
>