[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: DSRM is not absolute joke
- Subject: Re: Re: DSRM is not absolute joke
- From: "f.u.i.t.b.e.t" <fuitbet@yahoo.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 01:01:08 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <98vp6n$vr7$1@news.netmar.com> <a%Qs6.68661$lj4.1803015@news6.giganews.com> <mi%s6.35980$v5.77309@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <992a1u$2rml$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ab55e5d.11964751@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <99ch66$ee1$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <7_Cu6.443$hb.2263@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3ABB4352.652538F7@ozemail.com.au> <3ABE7AA6.41BDE7B6@mail.usyd.edu.au> <3ABEE130.77B14F59@ozemail.com.au> <99om82$n08$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <3ABFF2DD.48D7A0D9@ozemail.com.au> <4a85ftk51qtoigp006sdcg1nshskhjo745@4ax.com>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:36665
War veterans.... who are members voted on the tank purchase....well that`s
how it was told to me
"David Johnson" <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
4a85ftk51qtoigp006sdcg1nshskhjo745@4ax.com">news:4a85ftk51qtoigp006sdcg1nshskhjo745@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:54:07 GMT, Eben Levy <tkid@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
> >I am not disagreeing with Greg, Just with DSRM.
> >
> >It is fine for them to want to represent this. I do have a problem with
there
> >expressed need to get a WORKING tank. why do you need a working tank as a
> >static exhibit on a flat wagon?
>
>
> To defend themselves against invasion.