[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: DSRM is not absolute joke
- Subject: Re: Re: DSRM is not absolute joke
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 00:41:58 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <98vp6n$vr7$1@news.netmar.com> <a%Qs6.68661$lj4.1803015@news6.giganews.com> <mi%s6.35980$v5.77309@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <992a1u$2rml$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ab55e5d.11964751@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <99ch66$ee1$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <7_Cu6.443$hb.2263@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3ABB4352.652538F7@ozemail.com.au> <3ABE7AA6.41BDE7B6@mail.usyd.edu.au> <3ABEE130.77B14F59@ozemail.com.au> <99om82$n08$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <3ABFF2DD.48D7A0D9@ozemail.com.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:36658
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:54:07 GMT, Eben Levy <tkid@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
>I am not disagreeing with Greg, Just with DSRM.
>
>It is fine for them to want to represent this. I do have a problem with there
>expressed need to get a WORKING tank. why do you need a working tank as a
>static exhibit on a flat wagon?
To defend themselves against invasion.