Re: Railway upgrade to separate freight and passenger trains

["Dave Proctor" <david@sd3.mailbank.com>]

"f.u.i.t.b.e.t" <fuitbet@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
3aef58f7$0$25473$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3aef58f7$0$25473$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> One nation was and still is the biggest wank ever.

It was a joke - One Nation = Pauline Hanson = Please Explain.

Dave

> NRC was given $500 million to spend on the Interstate
> infrastructure.....replace stuffed bridges extend loops etc etc...Then
after
> NRC spends the bucks ARTC etc comes along and NRC does not get control of
> the Interstate network and nows pays well over $120 million per annum to
run
> on something that they invested $500 mill One nation funding.
> Oh and lets not forget about the Glendfield white elephant and still no
> dedicated freight line from Glenfield in!!!!
> "Dave Proctor" <david@spambait.proctor.net> wrote in message
> 4_HH6.41400$8j.6019166@bin1.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com">news:4_HH6.41400$8j.6019166@bin1.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> > "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> > 3aeebada$0$25466$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3aeebada$0$25466$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> > > "James C." <james_ccj@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> > > 3aeead67$0$25478$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3aeead67$0$25478$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> > > | http://www.abc.net.au/news/newslink/nat/newsnat-1may2001-61.htm
> > > |
> > > | Railway upgrade to separate freight and passenger trains
> > > | Mr Marchant says a separate freight track through Sydney would help
> the
> > > | whole nation.
> > > | "Partly it is because tracks are requiring upgrading, but the real
> issue
> > > is
> > > | that there isn't a freight link separate from the passenger link
> through
> > > | Sydney," Mr Marchant.
> > > | "What this proposes, is separating the freight lines from passenger
> > lines
> > > to
> > > | enable freight trains to move easily in and out of Sydney."
> > >
> > > One Nation re-visited.
> >
> > Please explain?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
>
>