[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Transport group call for trains to replace buses

Subject: Re: Transport group call for trains to replace buses
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:19:40 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <3ABE8ED3.F799BE01@fang.omni.com.au> <3abf0de0$0$25514$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:33658

"James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau> wrote in message
3abf0de0$0$25514$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3abf0de0$0$25514$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
>
> <Snip>
>
> Do Countrylink have enough spare rolling stocks for such service?
> (can preservation groups take over such trains? LVR and RTM do have some
> ex-Countrylink rolling stocks around)

Thereby missing the argument that they want modern stock, not stock that is
clapped out (100 years old they mentioned in the article, but I presume they
would include the Comet, HUB and RUB sets as life-expired as well).

Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Modern rolling stocks?
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau>

References:
- Transport group call for trains to replace buses
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>
- Re: Transport group call for trains to replace buses
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau>

Prev by Date: Re: DSRM is ....
Next by Date: Re: DSRM is an absolute joke
Prev by thread: Re: Transport group call for trains to replace buses
Next by thread: Modern rolling stocks?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread