[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]

Subject: Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:24:14 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <3AC28AFB.96485DC5@fang.omni.com.au> <3ac2928c$0$25475$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ac3048e$0$25491$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <HFDw6.108616$lj4.3180362@news6.giganews.com> <3ac596e8@news.alphalink.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:33974

"Adam Dunning" <adamdunning@start.com.au> wrote in message
3ac596e8@news.alphalink.com.au">news:3ac596e8@news.alphalink.com.au...

> So what are the differences between the Endevours and the explorers?
> What might possibly be needed to be done to convert them?

Purely internal (apart from the doors behind the drivers cab) - would not
take too much to convert them, I would imagine, the hardest part might be
the fitting of a toilet and catering facilities in the LE (or is it the TE,
I can never remember).

Dave

References:
- $50 million for new trains in Hunter
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>
- Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter
  - From: "Al" <alpout@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau>
- Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
  - From: "Adam Dunning" <adamdunning@start.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Indian Pacific passengers work up head of steam
Next by Date: The Overland
Prev by thread: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
Next by thread: Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread