[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CPH Railmotors
- Subject: Re: CPH Railmotors
- From: "Adam Dunning" <adamdunning@start.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:03:15 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <i5rQ6.25697$hV3.33562@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <eZHQ6.127$Lh6.19223@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <3b1a0124$1@news.alphalink.com.au> <ZkFS6.58$UC.10551@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:37243
"keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:ZkFS6.58$UC.10551@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...
>
> Adam Dunning <adamdunning@start.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3b1a0124$1@news.alphalink.com.au...
> > Inlines or V's ? (671's or 6V71's?)
> >
> > Adam
>
> Exactly what I wrote 6/71, not 6V71. They even have the old style 2 valve
> heads rather than 4.
I was of the opinion that the only 4 stroke motors that Detroit/GM had made
of that size was the recnt series 50's and 60's with the modified from
Mercedes series 55 (all in lines with 4, 6 and 6 cylinders respectively).
I'm pretty sure all of the 53's, 71's and 92's are two strokes.
Adam
>
> Dave Malcolm
>
>