Re: [NSW] State of the Environment

["Al" <alpout@optusnet.com.au>]

"Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
3aaf4d91$0$25521$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3aaf4d91$0$25521$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> "Al" <alpout@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> 3aaf446b$0$25490$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3aaf446b$0$25490$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> | "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> | | > "Al" <alpout@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>
> | > | and stations bypassed by those trains which aren't going to stop
> there.
> | >
> | > Stating the obvious?
> | >
> | Seeings as everyone else presents statistics in their favour (including
> you
> | Tezza), then yeah.
>
> Who's talking about statistics, if a train's not going to stop at a station,
> it probably *will* bypass it.
>


OK, misinterpreted your reply.  Sorry about that.  I think what was meant was
for complete bypasses of stations or town be used, not just a train going
through without stopping (which would allow trains to overtake each other
fairly easily).