[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triangle at Tarcoola
- Subject: Re: triangle at Tarcoola
- From: Tell <telljb@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:51:00 +0930
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: From Home
- References: <3A94E791.AE2125BE@efs.mq.edu.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:32503
Thanks Eddie, thats sorted that one.
....Tell
>Eddie Oliver <eoliver@efs.mq.edu.au> wrote:
> While at ARTC headquarters in Adelaide on 20/2, I took the opportunity
> to ask for a definitive statement re the debate on this newsgroup a few
> weeks ago about the existence of a triangle at Tarcoola.
>
> The answer is that a triangle does exist, in the sense that trains can
> proceed direct to the Alice Springs line from west of Tarcoola. However
> it is not a triangle in the normally-pictured sense, i.e. a set of
> tracks in close proximity like triangles in NSW or fork lines in
> Queensland.
>
> The junction points for the western arm of the "triangle" are some
> considerable distance away from Tarcoola (estimated to be some
> kilometres). They are outside Tarcoola yard limits, and a train order
> has to be issued to allow movement over the western arm.
>
> The western arm is said to be in poor condition but still usable at slow
> speed. It was used for ballast trains.
>
> Eddie