[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance

Subject: Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:59:39 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3A99EB69.FF7A9A77@fang.omni.com.au> <97d3ln$k9t$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <9054D70A2gunzelT333@203.164.20.149> <GFAm6.6836$v4.277226@ozemail.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:32488


"David Bennetts" <davibenn@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
GFAm6.6836$v4.277226@ozemail.com.au">news:GFAm6.6836$v4.277226@ozemail.com.au...
|
| "Michael" <usenet.spam@gunzel.net> wrote in message

| > Or are you the type who loves not to service the customer?

I've seen plenty of customers I'd like to service.


| It must be in the selection criteria for CityRail staff - the customer is
| always wrong, any trains which run late are due to passengers


It's a question in the entrance exam.

References:
- Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: "Nathan & Mel" <nathan1@ihug.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: "David Bennetts" <davibenn@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Cityrail- On time Running
Next by Date: Re: Woman dies after being hit by tram
Prev by thread: Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
Next by thread: Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread