[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance

Subject: Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
From: "David Bennetts" <davibenn@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:24:10 +1100
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <3A99EB69.FF7A9A77@fang.omni.com.au> <97d3ln$k9t$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <9054D70A2gunzelT333@203.164.20.149>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:32480


"Michael" <usenet.spam@gunzel.net> wrote in message
9054D70A2gunzelT333@203.164.20.149">news:9054D70A2gunzelT333@203.164.20.149...
> nathan1@ihug.com.au (Nathan & Mel) wrote in
> <97d3ln$k9t$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au>:
>
>
> Or are you the type who loves not to service the customer?
>
> M.
>
>
It must be in the selection criteria for CityRail staff - the customer is
always wrong, any trains which run late are due to passengers

Regards

David Bennetts

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: Marvin The Martian <"choochoo"@spin.net.au (nospam)>
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

References:
- Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: "Nathan & Mel" <nathan1@ihug.com.au>
- Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)

Prev by Date: Re: Woman dies after being hit by tram
Next by Date: [NSW] CityRail Excuses - Pardon my French
Prev by thread: Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
Next by thread: Re: Cityrail statistics show poor performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread