[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Metronet radios

Subject: Re: Metronet radios
From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:22:14 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3a9203b2.24534884@news.dingoblue.net.au> <3a9235e4$0$25489$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a924f2e$0$25505$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a9265e3$0$25520$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3A9458B9.556B93B5@pnc.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:32071


"BEE EFF" <mcreely@pnc.com.au> wrote in message
3A9458B9.556B93B5@pnc.com.au">news:3A9458B9.556B93B5@pnc.com.au...

| Motorola radios have been used all over the world for train ops with great
| success.

Except at FreightCorp. They were useless.

References:
- Metronet radios
  - From: dave60@dingoblue.net.au (Jack)
- Re: Metronet radios
  - From: "Glen O'Riley" <glen.orileyDES@PAMlinx.iwarp.com>
- Re: Metronet radios
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Metronet radios
  - From: "Glen O'Riley" <glen.orileyDES@PAMlinx.iwarp.com>
- Re: Metronet radios
  - From: BEE EFF <mcreely@pnc.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Ignore the retard (Was: new groop)
Next by Date: Re: Metronet radios
Prev by thread: Re: Metronet radios
Next by thread: Re: Metronet radios
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread