Re: re why ......

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

"Graeme" <grimegrime@hotmailnospam.com> wrote in message
96fvgk$75r$1@perki.connect.com.au">news:96fvgk$75r$1@perki.connect.com.au...
|
| "Rod [comtrain]" <freight_man@hotmail.com> wrote in message

| > If this sounds a little anti Traffic Branch, well it seems that it is
| > contagious. Reading between the lines, you seem to promote a similar
| apathy

| Have to disagree there Rod.The way I read Gregs remarks where that some
| blokes who purport to be drivers are taking themselves a tad too
| seriously.Its a well known  sign of maturity if you can have a laugh at
your
| self.True?

Except that Greg wasn't promoting that idea, he was putting shit on Drivers.


| > towards the Drivers, without whom you just would not have a job.
| Well with a statement like that Im not surprised.
| I thought the idea was we all worked in together and got the job done.If
| that meant the Guard did the driving,the fireman had a snooz in the
van,and
| the drive did the shunt,great.

They let guards drive in Mexico? Now I've heard everything.